The King Makers
The tale of Sayyid Brothers
During the 18th century Mughal Empire Sayyid Abdullah Khan and Sayyid Husain Ali Khan Barha, popularly known as Sayyid brothers, played a key role as King Makers. They were responsible for establishing Farrukh Siyar as the emperor of the Mughal Empire in India. At the death of Farrukh Siyar, the Sayyid Brothers successfully placed Rafi-Ud-Darajat, on the throne on 28th February 1719. The two brothers controlled the administration and activities of Rafi-Ud-Darajat. and made him a puppet. With his demise due to tuberculosis within four months from his enthronement, the Sayyid brothers made their move to enthrone Shah Jahan II. Their attempt to rule through the medium of an imperial puppet failed. Emperor Shah refused to be controlled by them. Alas, the Sayyid brothers were wiped out from the earth. The two "King Makers" lasted only a short span of 7 years in their King making business.
This story has made me reflect on the "Kingmaking"
business that goes on in our country and also in the Christian Church. In the
recent turn of events in Sri Lanka, we have seen and heard certain segments of
our society very boldly claiming that they were the "King Makers" of
the present Government.
What about the Church? Yes, the church too seems to be
having "kingmakers" and I would say in plenty. Often I wonder whether
we have too many of them which cause other problems. Some of the "king
making" alliances in the church under the labels of "Evangelicals,
Liberals, Conservatives, Sabahava rakaganimay viyapara (Church protecting
movements)" have turned out to be "King Makers" in bringing
individuals into Leadership. It is a known fact that such groupings have caused
much harm than good to the church. Ugly forms of canvassing, mudslinging
campaigns including anonymous letters have put the church Congregations into
very painful experiences of divisiveness in the Church.
A tale of two modern "King Makers"
A certain person who was holding a responsible position in a
church was approached by two people and sought a favour that was not
reasonable. When the person in office refused to grant the favour, the two
"Kingmakers" have said "remember we are the people who brought
you to this position. If you can't grant us our request, we have the powers to
remove you." "Kingmakers" can turn out to be very treacherous
who will make their "Kings" be puppets on a string like the Sayyed brothers.
This paints a very negative depiction of "King Making" both in the
Church and in the country. Because of such "king Makers," those in
positions of Leadership have avoided making decisions that are so necessary for
the common good of all. Those who sought to get into the seats of power and
leadership through the interventions of "King Makers" have finally
found themselves been pushed to very unpleasant tight corners by the "King
Makers". The Kings and leaders have
regretfully realized how foolishly they have played into the hands of
"King Makers", who will have "kings" as subjects to their
powers. There are also "King Makers" who make deals with Kings so
that they could also get into seats of power they desire.
Is King making something bad?
Turning through the pages of Scripture we can discover the
positive side of King Making business. It becomes positive because of God's
involvement from the divine perspective, including the political process both
in the world and in the church. He meddles in the affairs of mankind in
appointing rulers. Ultimately, it is God "who changes the times and the
seasons; He removes kings and establishes kings" (Daniel 2:21a), for
"the Most High is ruler over the realm of mankind and bestows it on whom
He wishes and sets over it the lowliest of men" (Daniel 4:17). "God
controls the process of selecting a leader, whether that process is by family
descent or democratic vote."
King Makers have a sacred task to perform
The Church has to act in a sacred manner when making leaders
("kings"). Conclaves, Synods, Conferences are God-ordained "King
Makers" legitimate bodies. Such gatherings are called by God to be on
their knees seeking discernment from God to bring in the right kind of persons
to leadership. But sadly what we see happening today is contrary.
Manipulations, Lobbying and campaigning in a very ugly and horrible manner.
Such things are unfit for the body of Christ but have become almost the norm
which is not at all an example to the world. When such wrongful activity is pointed
out, the "King Makers" get highly agitated and do their best to get
rid of those who oppose them.
The modern-day church has so much to learn from God and the
Scriptures when engaging itself in the King Making business. Does the modern
Church emulate the following when electing its leaders? But the LORD said to
Samuel, "Do not consider his appearance or his height, for I have rejected
him. The LORD does not look at the things people look at. People look at the
outward appearance, but the LORD looks at the heart." (1 Samuel 16:7)
We need good kingmakers
The Church and Church-related institutes need King Makers.
The issue is what is it that "King Makers" want to achieve through
their Kingmaking. Most of the "King Makers" seek to achieve their
personal agendas through the "King" they have enthroned. Like the two
sons of Zebedee, they seek the two left & right chairs for themselves to
get special privileges. They promote and campaign for a "King" whose
track record is not straight in terms of money morals and integrity so that
they could carry on their despicable activities.
The "King Makers" in the mind of God are people
who desire the common edification of the nation and the Church. They are in
fact community builders through their King Making business. Their joy would be
to see the appointment of someone into a position of leadership as chosen by
God whose priority will be to go after God's heart.
Rev. Asiri P. Perera
February 20, 2021
Quite a relevant topic! Good write up Rev. Asiri!
ReplyDeleteThanks, Spread the message
Delete👍
ReplyDeleteThanks, Spread the message
Delete